AI Code Assistants: GitHub Copilot vs Cursor vs Tabnine
Every developer should be using AI assistance. Here’s how to choose.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Price | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | $10-19/mo | Most developers |
| Cursor | $20/mo | AI-native workflow |
| Tabnine | Free-$12/mo | Privacy-focused |
| Cody (Sourcegraph) | Free-$9/mo | Large codebases |
| Amazon CodeWhisperer | Free-$19/mo | AWS developers |
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Copilot | Cursor | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autocomplete | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Chat | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★ |
| Codebase context | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Privacy | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| IDE support | ★★★★★ | Own IDE | ★★★★★ |
Use Case Matching
Most Developers
GitHub Copilot - Best autocomplete, VS Code integration
AI-First Workflow
Cursor - AI-native IDE, powerful chat
Enterprise/Privacy
Tabnine - On-premise option, no code sharing
AWS Shops
CodeWhisperer - AWS integration, security scans
Productivity Gains
| Metric | Improvement |
|---|---|
| Code completion speed | 40-55% |
| Bug reduction | 10-20% |
| Documentation time | 50%+ |
| Learning new codebases | 30% faster |
Want to boost your development team’s productivity? Let’s discuss AI coding tools.