Advanced Prompt Engineering: Beyond the Basics
Move beyond simple prompts to build reliable, production-grade AI applications.
Foundational Techniques
Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
Force step-by-step reasoning:
Question: If a store has 234 apples and sells 89,
then receives 156 more, how many does it have?
Without CoT: 301 (may be wrong)
With CoT:
"Let me think step by step:
1. Starting apples: 234
2. After selling 89: 234 - 89 = 145
3. After receiving 156: 145 + 156 = 301
The store has 301 apples."
Few-Shot Learning
Provide examples:
Task: Classify customer feedback sentiment
Example 1:
Feedback: "Great product, fast shipping!"
Sentiment: Positive
Example 2:
Feedback: "Item arrived broken, terrible experience"
Sentiment: Negative
Now classify:
Feedback: "Okay quality but overpriced"
Sentiment:
Role Prompting
Set context and expertise:
You are an expert financial analyst with 20 years
of experience in equity research. You specialize
in technology companies and valuation methodologies.
Analyze the following earnings report...
Advanced Techniques
Self-Consistency
Multiple reasoning paths for reliability:
Generate 3 different approaches to solve this problem,
then select the answer that appears most frequently.
Structured Output
Enforce specific formats:
Respond only in valid JSON with this structure:
{
"summary": "string, max 100 words",
"key_points": ["array of 3-5 strings"],
"sentiment": "positive|neutral|negative",
"confidence": "number 0-1"
}
Prompt Chaining
Break complex tasks into steps:
Step 1: Extract key entities from the document
Step 2: Summarize the main argument
Step 3: Identify supporting evidence
Step 4: Generate final analysis
Reliability Patterns
Guardrails
Add constraints to prevent issues:
Instructions:
- Only use information from the provided context
- If uncertain, say "I don't have enough information"
- Never generate harmful or inappropriate content
- Cite specific sources when making claims
Error Handling
Build in recovery:
If you cannot complete the task:
1. Explain why you cannot proceed
2. Suggest what additional information would help
3. Offer an alternative approach if available
Validation
Verify outputs:
After generating your response:
1. Check that all required fields are present
2. Verify numbers and calculations
3. Confirm sources are cited
4. Flag any uncertainties
Domain-Specific Prompts
Code Generation
You are a senior software engineer writing production code.
Requirements:
- Use {language} best practices
- Include error handling
- Add comprehensive comments
- Write unit tests
- Consider edge cases
Generate code for: {specification}
Data Analysis
Analyze this dataset as an experienced data scientist:
1. Describe the data structure
2. Identify key patterns and outliers
3. Suggest relevant visualizations
4. Provide actionable insights
5. Note any data quality issues
Content Creation
You are a content strategist for {industry}.
Create content that:
- Matches brand voice: {description}
- Targets audience: {persona}
- Achieves goal: {objective}
- Follows format: {specifications}
Optimization Techniques
Token Efficiency
Reduce costs without losing quality:
❌ Verbose:
"Please provide a detailed and comprehensive analysis
of the following text, making sure to cover all
important aspects and provide thorough explanations..."
✓ Concise:
"Analyze this text. Cover: key themes, sentiment,
and recommendations."
Context Management
Handle long contexts:
The following document sections are provided in order
of relevance. Focus primarily on Section 1 and 2.
[SECTION 1: Most relevant]
...
[SECTION 2: Supporting context]
...
[SECTION 3: Background only]
...
Caching Strategies
Reuse common prompts:
System prompt (cached):
[Standard instructions, role, format requirements]
User prompt (variable):
[Specific task with user input]
Testing and Evaluation
Prompt Testing
For each prompt variation, test with:
- Edge cases
- Adversarial inputs
- Boundary conditions
- Multi-turn interactions
Quality Metrics
| Metric | How to Measure |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Ground truth comparison |
| Consistency | Same input variance |
| Latency | Response time |
| Token usage | Input/output tokens |
A/B Testing
Test variations systematically:
- Prompt A: Detailed instructions
- Prompt B: Example-based
- Prompt C: Minimal guidance
Measure: accuracy, speed, cost, user preference
Production Considerations
Version Control
Track prompt versions:
prompt_id: user_classification_v3
version: 3.2.1
last_updated: 2026-01-04
author: team_ml
changes: Added edge case handling
Monitoring
Track in production:
- Success rate
- Error patterns
- User feedback
- Model behavior changes
Fallback Strategies
Primary: Claude Opus 4.5
Fallback 1: Claude Sonnet 4
Fallback 2: Simplified prompt with GPT-5.2
Error: Human escalation
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Solution |
|---|---|
| Ambiguous instructions | Be specific and explicit |
| Missing context | Provide necessary background |
| Overloaded prompts | Break into smaller tasks |
| Inconsistent outputs | Add structure and examples |
| Security issues | Validate inputs, sanitize outputs |
Need help optimizing your AI prompts? Let’s discuss your use case.